Reilly v. . Simonson

New York Court of Appeals

Reilly v. . Simonson

111 N.E. 753, 217 N.Y. 636, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1392

DecidedFebruary 4, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 111 N.E. 753 (Reilly v. . Simonson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reilly v. . Simonson, 111 N.E. 753, 217 N.Y. 636, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1392 (N.Y. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant presents for our consideration a doubtful and serious question which we are unable to determine, for the reason that the form of the order does not enable us to assume jurisdiction. (Caponigri v. Altieri, 164 N. Y. 476; Wright v. Smith, 209 N. Y. 249.)

The appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI