Reilly v. Shipman
This text of 254 U.S. 614 (Reilly v. Shipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted November 8, 1920. Decided November 22, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 302; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444. (2) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313, 333; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577. Mr. Frank Fair cloth and Mr. Harry L. Patton for plaintiff in error. Mr. Guy Mason, Mr. W. W. Spalding, Mr. S. B. Davis, Jr., and Mr. E. R. Wright for defendants in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 U.S. 614, 41 S. Ct. 64, 65 L. Ed. 439, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-shipman-scotus-1920.