Reilly v. Shipman

254 U.S. 614, 41 S. Ct. 64, 65 L. Ed. 439, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1136
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 22, 1920
DocketNo. 502
StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 614 (Reilly v. Shipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reilly v. Shipman, 254 U.S. 614, 41 S. Ct. 64, 65 L. Ed. 439, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1136 (1920).

Opinion

Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted November 8, 1920. Decided November 22, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 302; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444. (2) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313, 333; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577. Mr. Frank Fair cloth and Mr. Harry L. Patton for plaintiff in error. Mr. Guy Mason, Mr. W. W. Spalding, Mr. S. B. Davis, Jr., and Mr. E. R. Wright for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co.
191 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Devine v. Los Angeles
202 U.S. 313 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Shulthis v. McDougal
225 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Hall v. Burr
234 U.S. 712 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Yurkonis
238 U.S. 439 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 U.S. 614, 41 S. Ct. 64, 65 L. Ed. 439, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-shipman-scotus-1920.