Reilly v. Rawleigh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reilly v. Rawleigh

251 A.D. 782, 296 N.Y.S. 48, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7482

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 782 (Reilly v. Rawleigh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reilly v. Rawleigh, 251 A.D. 782, 296 N.Y.S. 48, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $2,816 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We find the court erred in allowing the jury to consider as an element of damage the loss of earnings to plaintiff in her business as keeper of a rooming and boarding house. (Dalmas v. Gordon, 210 App. Div. 239; Galanis v. Simon, 222 id. 330; affd., 250 N. Y. 524.) All concur. (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff and for loss of services of plaintiff’s son due to injuries received in an automobile collision. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present ■—■ Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $2,816 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We find the court erred in allowing the jury to consider as an element of damage the loss of earnings to plaintiff in her business as keeper of a rooming and boarding house. (Dalmas v. Gordon, 210 App. Div. 239; Galanis v. Simon, 222 id. 330; affd., 250 N. Y. 524.) All concur. (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff and for loss of services of plaintiff’s son due to injuries received in an automobile collision. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present ■—■ Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 782, 296 N.Y.S. 48, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-rawleigh-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack