Reilly v. Oakwood Heights Community Church

269 A.D.2d 582, 704 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2345
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated October 28, 1998, which denied their motion to reargue a prior motion of the defendant and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint unless the plaintiff provided additional discovery within 60 days of the date of the order.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied reargument is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

Under CPLR 3214 (b), service of a notice of motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 stays disclosure until determination of the motion unless the court orders otherwise. Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, although the stay is automatic, a court can direct otherwise if there is a legitimate need for discovery (see, John Eric Jacoby, M.D., P. C. v Loper Assocs., 249 AD2d 277, 279). Here, there was a legitimate need for discovery. Therefore, the court properly considered the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to provide discovery during the pendency of the motion for summary judgment. Additionally, based upon the plaintiff’s failure to exchange the relevant discovery, the court did not err in issuing the conditional order.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reilly v. Oakwood Heights Community Church, 269 A.D.2d 582, 704 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 582 (Reilly v. Oakwood Heights Community Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mees v. Buiter
2020 NY Slip Op 05201 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. Country Wide Ins. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Shovak v. Long Island Commercial Bank
35 A.D.3d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)