Reilly v. McKeefrey

108 N.Y.S. 1011

This text of 108 N.Y.S. 1011 (Reilly v. McKeefrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reilly v. McKeefrey, 108 N.Y.S. 1011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court will not disturb the determination of facts arrived at- by the learned trial justice in this case, a hors' case—a determination resting upon conflicting testimony given by the seller and the buyer and their respective experts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., and MacLEAN, J., concur. BISCHOFF; J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 N.Y.S. 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-mckeefrey-nyappterm-1908.