Reilly v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Reilly v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

87 N.Y.S. 423

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.Y.S. 423 (Reilly v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reilly v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 87 N.Y.S. 423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinions

FREEDMAN, P. J.

Plaintiff’s case rests upon his own uncorroborated testimony, and, in the course of that, the plaintiff made highly contradictory statements upon the material points of the case. The defendant showed by the testimony of several disinterested witnesses, as well as- by the testimony of the conductor and the motorman, a state of facts which, if true, makes a recovery for the plaintiff impossible. The probabilities also favor the theory of the defense. The verdict is against the clear weight of the evidence, and, in the interest of justice, there should be a new trial.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

BLANCHARD, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FREEDMAN, P. J.

Plaintiff’s case rests upon his own uncorroborated testimony, and, in the course of that, the plaintiff made highly contradictory statements upon the material points of the case. The defendant showed by the testimony of several disinterested witnesses, as well as- by the testimony of the conductor and the motorman, a state of facts which, if true, makes a recovery for the plaintiff impossible. The probabilities also favor the theory of the defense. The verdict is against the clear weight of the evidence, and, in the interest of justice, there should be a new trial.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

BLANCHARD, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.Y.S. 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.