Reilly v. Griffith
61 A.2d 235, 142 N.J. Eq. 724
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Woodruff, and reported at 141 N. J. Eq. 154.
For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Waci-ieneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Colie, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reilly v. Griffith, 61 A.2d 235, 142 N.J. Eq. 724 (N.J. 1948).
61 A.2d 235 (Reilly v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. RKA CORP.
753 A.2d 1112 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)
Whitmore v. NJ Div. of Motor Vehicles
349 A.2d 560 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Mihranian, Inc. v. Padula
342 A.2d 523 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Plainfield Courier News Co. v. Hollander
226 A.2d 51 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Puritan Dairy Products Co. v. Christoffers
148 A.2d 223 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Notaro v. Notaro
118 A.2d 880 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Gahn v. Gahn
104 A.2d 862 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)