Reilly v. City of Pittsburgh

484 A.2d 736, 506 Pa. 165, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 325
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 13, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 484 A.2d 736 (Reilly v. City of Pittsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reilly v. City of Pittsburgh, 484 A.2d 736, 506 Pa. 165, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 325 (Pa. 1984).

Opinion

ORDER OF COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court accepts plenary jurisdiction, 42 Pa.C.S. § 726, and dismisses the Complaints. The language of the statute clearly demonstrates that the legislative intent in the original Home Rule Charter and Optional Plans Law, Act of April 13, 1972, No. 62, § 101, 53 P.S. § 1-101 et seq., was to grant the local communities, except as specifically prohibit[167]*167ed in § l-302(a)(7), the right to fix rates, but not subjects, of taxation.

NIX, C.J., and McDERMOTT, J., dissent, would not accept plenary jurisdiction, and would remand the case to proceed to a determination on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penn Hills School District v. Municipality of Penn Hills
555 A.2d 302 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Cox's v. Municipality of Monroeville
484 A.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 A.2d 736, 506 Pa. 165, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-city-of-pittsburgh-pa-1984.