Reilly v. Cisneros
This text of 44 F.3d 140 (Reilly v. Cisneros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William A. Reilly appeals from the November 16, 1993, judgment of the District Court for the Western District of New York (John T. Elfvin, Judge) ordering his former employer, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), to pay him back pay for discharging him in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 (1988), but ending the back pay award as of the date Reilly rejected an offer of another position with HUD. The primary issue is whether the District Court erred in finding that Reilly’s rejection of this offer was unreasonable, a finding that ended entitlement to back pay accruing after the date the offer was rejected.
[141]*141We affirm the judgment of the District Court on the opinion of Judge Elfvin, reported at 885 F.Supp. 96.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F.3d 140, 1995 WL 4933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-cisneros-ca2-1995.