Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reiko v. Henry v. State of Florida

Reiko v. Henry v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 2016·No. 16-4186·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

REIKO V. HENRY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-4186

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed October 10, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Reiko V. Henry, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reiko v. Henry v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Reiko v. Henry v. State of Florida (Reiko v. Henry v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.