Reik v. Reik
141 A. 921, 103 N.J. Eq. 23, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 633
This text of 141 A. 921 (Reik v. Reik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reik v. Reik, 141 A. 921, 103 N.J. Eq. 23, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 633 (N.J. 1928).
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 523.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Héteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roskein v. Roskein
96 A.2d 437 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
141 A. 921, 103 N.J. Eq. 23, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reik-v-reik-nj-1928.