Reik v. Reik

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Reik v. Reik

141 A. 921, 103 N.J. Eq. 23, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 633

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 14, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 523.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Héteield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 523.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Héteield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Reik v. Reik, 141 A. 921, 103 N.J. Eq. 23, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 633 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

141 A. 921 (Reik v. Reik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related