Reik v. Reik

412 So. 2d 40, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 412 So. 2d 40 (Reik v. Reik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reik v. Reik, 412 So. 2d 40, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Over the wife’s appeal, the awards of permanent periodic and lump sum alimony and child support, as well as the requirement that the marital home be sold and the proceeds divided, are affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); see, Scott v. Scott, 408 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Gorman v. Gorman, 400 So.2d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); compare, Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duarte v. Duarte
447 So. 2d 928 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 So. 2d 40, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reik-v-reik-fladistctapp-1982.