Reik v. Reik

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reik v. Reik

412 So. 2d 40, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1982·No. No. 81-1016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Over the wife’s appeal, the awards of permanent periodic and lump sum alimony and child support, as well as the requirement that the marital home be sold and the proceeds divided, are affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); see, Scott v. Scott, 408 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Gorman v. Gorman, 400 So.2d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); compare, Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Over the wife’s appeal, the awards of permanent periodic and lump sum alimony and child support, as well as the requirement that the marital home be sold and the proceeds divided, are affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); see, Scott v. Scott, 408 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Gorman v. Gorman, 400 So.2d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); compare, Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reik v. Reik, 412 So. 2d 40, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

412 So. 2d 40 (Reik v. Reik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related