Reik v. Reik
This text of 412 So. 2d 40 (Reik v. Reik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Over the wife’s appeal, the awards of permanent periodic and lump sum alimony and child support, as well as the requirement that the marital home be sold and the proceeds divided, are affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); see, Scott v. Scott, 408 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Gorman v. Gorman, 400 So.2d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); compare, Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 So. 2d 40, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reik-v-reik-fladistctapp-1982.