Reigle v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Reigle v. United States

182 A.2d 494, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 361

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1962·No. No. 3012·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by the court of simple assault, trial by jury having been waived. The several contentions raised on this appeal are not borne out by the record. The case presented a simple and direct issue of credibility and the testimony was conflicting. We cannot say on the record ■before us that there is any basis for disturbing the court’s finding as the evidence presented by the prosecution was obviously sufficient to support the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by the court of simple assault, trial by jury having been waived. The several contentions raised on this appeal are not borne out by the record. The case presented a simple and direct issue of credibility and the testimony was conflicting. We cannot say on the record ■before us that there is any basis for disturbing the court’s finding as the evidence presented by the prosecution was obviously sufficient to support the judgment.

Affirmed.

Reigle v. United States, 182 A.2d 494, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 361 (D.C. 1962).

Pincite

182 A.2d 494 (Reigle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.