Reighard v. Flinn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reighard v. Flinn

44 A. 1080, 194 Pa. 352, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 391

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 2, 1900·No. Appeal, No. 136·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We think the question now presented on this record is materially different from the one which arose when the case was here before. The landing in question is now devoted to a strictly public use which brings it within the general supervision and control of the municipal authority. The views expressed by the learned court below we think are those which now control the [359]*359situation, and we therefore affirm the judgment upon the opinion filed.

Judgment affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We think the question now presented on this record is materially different from the one which arose when the case was here before. The landing in question is now devoted to a strictly public use which brings it within the general supervision and control of the municipal authority. The views expressed by the learned court below we think are those which now control the [359]*359situation, and we therefore affirm the judgment upon the opinion filed.

Judgment affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Reighard v. Flinn, 44 A. 1080, 194 Pa. 352, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 391 (Pa. 1900).

Pincite

44 A. 1080 (Reighard v. Flinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related