Reigh v. State
This text of 882 So. 2d 435 (Reigh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s revocation of appellant’s probation. The condition of probation that appellant “attend and complete” an anger management program specified neither a program nor the time when the program had to be completed. See Markel v. State, 855 So.2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 801 So.2d 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Willis v. State, 727 So.2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Archer v. State, 604 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We note the record contains a letter which indicates that appellant completed an anger management program while he was incarcerated for the violation of probation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
882 So. 2d 435, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reigh-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.