Reigh v. State

882 So. 2d 435, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12490
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 2004·No. Nos. 4D03-1071, 4D03-1074, 4D03-1072, 4D03-1158, 4D03-1073·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s revocation of appellant’s probation. The condition of probation that appellant “attend and complete” an anger management program specified neither a program nor the time when the program had to be completed. See Markel v. State, 855 So.2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 801 So.2d 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Willis v. State, 727 So.2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Archer v. State, 604 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We note the record contains a letter which indicates that appellant completed an anger management program while he was incarcerated for the violation of probation.

FARMER, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reigh v. State, 882 So. 2d 435, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12490 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

882 So. 2d 435 (Reigh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Archer v. State
604 So. 2d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Willis v. State
727 So. 2d 952 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
O'NEAL v. State
801 So. 2d 280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Markel v. State
855 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)