Reifman v. Micon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Reifman v. Micon

207 Ill. App. 175

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 11, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,198

StatusPublished

This text of 207 Ill. App. 175 (Reifman v. Micon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reifman v. Micon, 207 Ill. App. 175 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Assumpsit, Action of, § 56* — -when agent not deemed to have received money for the use of another. An agent for the purchasers of land who receives the initial payment from his clients cannot be deemed to have received money for the use of the sellers under a contract for the sale of land, where" he received it for the purpose of depositing it with a certain bank, which, in turn, was to hold it for the mutual benefit of the parties concerned, and the agent returned the money to the principal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Assumpsit, Action of, § 56* — -when agent not deemed to have received money for the use of another. An agent for the purchasers of land who receives the initial payment from his clients cannot be deemed to have received money for the use of the sellers under a contract for the sale of land, where" he received it for the purpose of depositing it with a certain bank, which, in turn, was to hold it for the mutual benefit of the parties concerned, and the agent returned the money to the principal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 Ill. App. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reifman-v-micon-illappct-1917.