Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.
This text of Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp. (Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MARTIN GARDNER REIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant. ____________________
2010-1334,-1391,-1392 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Case No. 98-CV-0266, Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARTIN G. REIFFIN, of Danville, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was JOSEPH L. SPIEGEL, Spiegel Brown Fichera & Acard, of Poughkeepsie, New York.
TODD M. SIEGEL, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, of Portland, Oregon, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was JOHN D. VANDENBERG. Of counsel on the brief were ERIC L. WESENBERG, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California and STEPHEN P. MCGRATH, Microsoft Corporation, of Redmond, Washington. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 24, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiffin-v-microsoft-corp-cafc-2011.