Reiff v. Real Estate Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Reiff v. Real Estate Commission

362 A.2d 981, 169 Conn. 128, 1975 Conn. LEXIS 804

DecidedJuly 8, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 362 A.2d 981 (Reiff v. Real Estate Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reiff v. Real Estate Commission, 362 A.2d 981, 169 Conn. 128, 1975 Conn. LEXIS 804 (Colo. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case arose as an appeal to the Court of Common Pleas from the action of the real estate commission in revoking the plaintiff’s real estate broker’s license. The revocation was made pursuant to the provisions of § 20-323 of the General Statutes which provides that any real estate licensee “convicted of a violation of any of the offenses enumerated in § 20-320 shall incur a forfeiture of his license,” that the clerk of any court wherein such a conviction has been had shall forward to the commission a certified copy of the conviction and that upon receipt of such a copy the commission shall within ten days notify the licensee in writing of the revocation of his license. The offenses enumerated in § 20-320 include obtaining money under false pretenses and larceny. The clerk of the Superior Court in Hartford County filed [129]*129with the commission a certified copy of a judgment of that court reciting the conviction of the plaintiff upon pleas of guilty to the crimes of obtaining money by false pretenses and larceny in the second degree. These facts are not disputed and the Court of Common Pleas dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal.

We find no merit whatsoever in the plaintiff’s appeal to this court from that judgment.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case arose as an appeal to the Court of Common Pleas from the action of the real estate commission in revoking the plaintiff’s real estate broker’s license. The revocation was made pursuant to the provisions of § 20-323 of the General Statutes which provides that any real estate licensee “convicted of a violation of any of the offenses enumerated in § 20-320 shall incur a forfeiture of his license,” that the clerk of any court wherein such a conviction has been had shall forward to the commission a certified copy of the conviction and that upon receipt of such a copy the commission shall within ten days notify the licensee in writing of the revocation of his license. The offenses enumerated in § 20-320 include obtaining money under false pretenses and larceny. The clerk of the Superior Court in Hartford County filed [129]*129with the commission a certified copy of a judgment of that court reciting the conviction of the plaintiff upon pleas of guilty to the crimes of obtaining money by false pretenses and larceny in the second degree. These facts are not disputed and the Court of Common Pleas dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal.

We find no merit whatsoever in the plaintiff’s appeal to this court from that judgment.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 A.2d 981, 169 Conn. 128, 1975 Conn. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiff-v-real-estate-commission-conn-1975.