Reiff v. Completely Bare Distributors, LLC
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:20-CV-473-D
KARINA REIFF, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) COMPLETELY BARE DISTRIBUTORS _ ) LLC, and ULTA SALON COSMETICS & ) FRAGRANCE, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) .
On October 2, 2020, Karina Reiff (“Reiff or “plaintiff”) moved to remand this action to Wake County Superior Court [D.E. 11]. On October 23, 2020; defendants responded in opposition [D.E. 17]. For the reasons stated in the defendants’ response in opposition, the court DENIES as meritless plaintiff's motion to remand [D.E. 11]. See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b); Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350-56 (1999); Elliott v. American States Ins. Co., 883 F.3d 384, 391 (4th Cir. 2018); Savitamagan, LLC v. Seneca Ins. Co., No. 1:16CV328, 2016 WL 4186999, at *2 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2016) (unpublished); Harris v. Maready, 311 N.C. 536, 544, 319 S.E.2d 912, 917 (1984); Hall v. Lassiter, 44 N.C. App. 23, 25, 260 S.E.2d 155, 157 (1979). SO ORDERED. This 26 day of November 2020.
fos C. DEVER II United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reiff v. Completely Bare Distributors, LLC (Reiff v. Completely Bare Distributors, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.