Reifenberg v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 556, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1099
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 1, 1954
DocketReap. Dec. 8364; Entry Nos. 820568; 828885
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 556 (Reifenberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reifenberg v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 556, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1099 (cusc 1954).

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise invoiced as “Ribbon Isinglass”, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, at $.6525 per pound, packed.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value, as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the merchandise involved herein at the time of exportation thereof.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to he the proper basis for the determination of the value of the ribbon isinglass here involved, and that such value was $0.6525 per pound, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Cust. Ct. 556, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reifenberg-v-united-states-cusc-1954.