Reifeiss v. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reifeiss v. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

399 S.W.3d 40, 2012 WL 4557254, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1221

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 2, 2012·No. No. ED 96939·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Ann Reifeiss and Jana Jill Schmitt, as personal representatives of the estate of Margaret A. Zeller (collectively referred to herein as “Plaintiffs”), appeal the judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of St. Luke’s Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals (“St. Luke’s”) on Plaintiffs’ claim of negligence. The trial court did not err in excluding Plaintiffs’ evidence at trial. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Ann Reifeiss and Jana Jill Schmitt, as personal representatives of the estate of Margaret A. Zeller (collectively referred to herein as “Plaintiffs”), appeal the judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of St. Luke’s Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals (“St. Luke’s”) on Plaintiffs’ claim of negligence. The trial court did not err in excluding Plaintiffs’ evidence at trial. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Reifeiss v. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals, 399 S.W.3d 40, 2012 WL 4557254, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

399 S.W.3d 40 (Reifeiss v. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.