Reife v. Osmers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reife v. Osmers

225 A.D. 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D. 895 (Reife v. Osmers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reife v. Osmers, 225 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. No appeal was taken to this court from the judgment. This court affirmed an order granting judgment on the pleadings. The judgment subsequently entered has not been reviewed. If essential to review by the Court of Appeals, the appeal maybe taken directly to that court from the judgment so entered. (See Redman v. Verplex Art Co., Inc., 237 N. Y. 475.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. No appeal was taken to this court from the judgment. This court affirmed an order granting judgment on the pleadings. The judgment subsequently entered has not been reviewed. If essential to review by the Court of Appeals, the appeal maybe taken directly to that court from the judgment so entered. (See Redman v. Verplex Art Co., Inc., 237 N. Y. 475.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reife-v-osmers-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack