Reidy v. State

99 So. 3d 995, 2012 WL 5273045, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18752
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 2012
DocketNo. 5D12-1454
StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 3d 995 (Reidy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reidy v. State, 99 So. 3d 995, 2012 WL 5273045, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18752 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court erred in failing to address the merits of David Reidy’s motion for rehearing since the motion was timely filed. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to consider the motion on its merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 So. 3d 995, 2012 WL 5273045, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reidy-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.