Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reidy v. State

Reidy v. State

99 So. 3d 995, 2012 WL 5273045, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reidy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3913 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2012·No. No. 5D12-1454·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court erred in failing to address the merits of David Reidy’s motion for rehearing since the motion was timely filed. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to consider the motion on its merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reidy v. State, 99 So. 3d 995, 2012 WL 5273045, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18752 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

99 So. 3d 995 (Reidy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.