Reidy v. Connelie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reidy v. Connelie

91 A.D.2d 1099, 458 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 1099 (Reidy v. Connelie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reidy v. Connelie, 91 A.D.2d 1099, 458 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion for clarification denied, without costs. Since the matter was remitted to respondent for the conduct of proceedings (Matter of Reidy v Connelie, 82 AD2d 986), it is for respondent to determine the format of such proceedings. Petitioners may, of course, raise this issue upon judicial review of any ultimate adverse determination. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion for clarification denied, without costs. Since the matter was remitted to respondent for the conduct of proceedings (Matter of Reidy v Connelie, 82 AD2d 986), it is for respondent to determine the format of such proceedings. Petitioners may, of course, raise this issue upon judicial review of any ultimate adverse determination. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 1099, 458 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reidy-v-connelie-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack