Reidy v. Connelie
91 A.D.2d 1099, 458 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reidy v. Connelie. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 A.D.2d 986 →
Opinion
— Motion for clarification denied, without costs. Since the matter was remitted to respondent for the conduct of proceedings (Matter of Reidy v Connelie, 82 AD2d 986), it is for respondent to determine the format of such proceedings. Petitioners may, of course, raise this issue upon judicial review of any ultimate adverse determination. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reidy v. Connelie, 91 A.D.2d 1099, 458 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
91 A.D.2d 1099 (Reidy v. Connelie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reidy v. Connelie
82 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)