Reidy v. City of Syracuse

252 A.D. 838, 299 N.Y.S. 122, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6419
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs on this appeal to either party. Memorandum: A provision of the Election Law requires the common council of the city of Syracuse, among others, to state its reasons for not designating as a polling place in an election district a school or other public building when such building is located within the boundaries of such election district. We hold that this provision of the statute is directory and that failure to comply therewith in the ordinance adopted by the city council of the city of Syracuse on August 17,1937, designating polling places in such city does not invalidate the ordinance or any part thereof. Therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to restrain acts necessary to make the ordinance effective. All concur, Sears, P. J., not voting. (The order denies a motion for a temporary injunction.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ. [164 Misc. 656.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reidy v. City of Syracuse, 252 A.D. 838, 299 N.Y.S. 122, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 838 (Reidy v. City of Syracuse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koeppel v. Southard
30 Misc. 2d 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)