Reidt v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.
This text of 34 P. 150 (Reidt v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts in these two cases being nearly the same as those in the case of Enoch v. Spokane Falls, etc., Ry. Co., ante, p. 393, and the legal questions involved being identical, it was stipulated by counsel for the respective parties that the three causes should be heard together, and that the disposition of the cases should be governed by the decision in that case, in which alone briefs were filed. «
For the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case, the judgment of the lower court in each of these cases is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 P. 150, 6 Wash. 623, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reidt-v-spokane-falls-northern-railway-co-wash-1893.