Reidheimer v. Police Jury

7 La. App. 319, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 621
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 10, 1927
DocketNo. 2935
StatusPublished

This text of 7 La. App. 319 (Reidheimer v. Police Jury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reidheimer v. Police Jury, 7 La. App. 319, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 621 (La. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

ODOM, J.

The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of Thomas C. Dick versus the same defendants, No. 2934 on the docket of this court, this day decided, except that in addition to the fence destroyed in locating the road the Highway Commission destroyed a dipping vat' worth $100.00. Plaintiff testified .that his total damage was $244.00. No other testimony was introduced.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Thomas C. Dick versus Police Jury of Bienville Parish, et als., No. 2934 on the docket of this court, this day decided, the judgment appealed from is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 La. App. 319, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reidheimer-v-police-jury-lactapp-1927.