Reidhead v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Reidhead v. State

292 P. 1117, 37 Ariz. 261, 1930 Ariz. LEXIS 142

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 1, 1930

DocketCriminal No. 725.

StatusPublished

This text of 292 P. 1117 (Reidhead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reidhead v. State, 292 P. 1117, 37 Ariz. 261, 1930 Ariz. LEXIS 142 (Ark. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny and has appealed to this court. No brief has been filed on his behalf, but we have examined the record for fundamental error. The information charges the offense of grand larceny, and the verdict of the jury found the defendant guilty thereof. The minutes show that the proceedings were in all respects regular, and no error of law appears on the face of the record.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny and has appealed to this court. No brief has been filed on his behalf, but we have examined the record for fundamental error. The information charges the offense of grand larceny, and the verdict of the jury found the defendant guilty thereof. The minutes show that the proceedings were in all respects regular, and no error of law appears on the face of the record.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 P. 1117, 37 Ariz. 261, 1930 Ariz. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reidhead-v-state-ariz-1930.