Reidenbach v. A. I. Namm & Son

99 F.2d 1013, 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 675, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3090
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 1938
DocketNo. 39
StatusPublished

This text of 99 F.2d 1013 (Reidenbach v. A. I. Namm & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reidenbach v. A. I. Namm & Son, 99 F.2d 1013, 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 675, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3090 (2d Cir. 1938).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Decrees, 25 F.Supp. 235, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reidenbach v. A. I. Namm & Son
25 F. Supp. 235 (E.D. New York, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 F.2d 1013, 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 675, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reidenbach-v-a-i-namm-son-ca2-1938.