Reid v. Warden

246 A.2d 312, 5 Md. App. 199, 1968 Md. App. LEXIS 362
CourtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 2, 1968
Docket30, September Term, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 246 A.2d 312 (Reid v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Special Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. Warden, 246 A.2d 312, 5 Md. App. 199, 1968 Md. App. LEXIS 362 (Md. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application of James Reid for leave to appeal from an order of Judge Shirley B. Jones, presiding in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, denying relief prayed in a petition under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act is denied for the reasons set forth by Judge Jones in the memorandum accompanying the order.

We note, however, that the test of the inadequacy of counsel is no longer whether the representation was so deficient as to make a farce out of the trial. The rule followed by this Court is that counsel is incompetent when under all the circumstances of the particular case the accused has not been afforded a genuine and effective representation. Green v. War *200 den, 3 Md. App. 266. From the record before us, we find that the applicant was afforded adequate and effective representation.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davenport v. State
253 A.2d 768 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1969)
O'Connor v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
253 A.2d 434 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.2d 312, 5 Md. App. 199, 1968 Md. App. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-warden-mdctspecapp-1968.