Reid v. Tyson

91 S.E. 1066, 19 Ga. App. 677, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 304
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 4, 1917
Docket8202
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 1066 (Reid v. Tyson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. Tyson, 91 S.E. 1066, 19 Ga. App. 677, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. A nonsuit should not be granted unless “the plaintiff fails to make out a prima facie case, or if, admitting all the facts proved and all reasonable deductions from them, the plaintiff ought not to recover.” Civil Code of 1910, § 5942.

2. In this case, there being evidence upon which a'jury could have based a verdict for the plaintiff,’ the trial judge erred in granting a nonsuit. Bryan v. Watson, 20 Ga. 480 (51); East & West R. Co. v. Sims, 80 Ga. 807 (6 S. E. 595) ; Vickers v. A. & W. P. R. Co., 64 Ga. 306.

.Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenlcins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gresham v. Stewart
119 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 1066, 19 Ga. App. 677, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-tyson-gactapp-1917.