Reid v. Stevens
120 Mass. 209, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 152
Opinion
The allegation in the declaration, that the defendant made a contract in writing, was denied in the answer, and was not supported by evidence of a contract not signed by the defendant. The objection of variance was open to the defendant, although he had not set up the statute of frauds. The case is thus distinguished from Middlesex Co. v. Osgood, 4 Gray, 447. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reid v. Stevens, 120 Mass. 209, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 152 (Mass. 1876).
120 Mass. 209 (Reid v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keller v. Stobo
225 Ill. App. 603 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
People's Mining & Milling Co. v. Central Consolidated Mines Corp.
20 Colo. App. 561 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1905)
Williams-Hayward Shoe Co. v. Brooks
64 P. 342 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1901)