Reid v. State

333 S.W.2d 142, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3079

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reid v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 169 Tex. Crim. 261 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 1960·No. Nos. 31130-31134·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

In each of these appeals appellant was convicted upon his plea of guilty before the court of forgery, and his punishment was assessed at 6 years.

The sentences have the same cumulation provision as in our Cause No. 31,129, but the six sentences are concurrent with each other.

The records are in the same condition as the record in Reid v. State, No. 31,129, Tex.Cr.App. 333 S.W.2d 140.

In the absence of notice of appeal given in open court during the term at which the convictions were had, the appeals are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Judge.

In each of these appeals appellant was convicted upon his plea of guilty before the court of forgery, and his punishment was assessed at 6 years.

The sentences have the same cumulation provision as in our Cause No. 31,129, but the six sentences are concurrent with each other.

The records are in the same condition as the record in Reid v. State, No. 31,129, Tex.Cr.App. 333 S.W.2d 140.

In the absence of notice of appeal given in open court during the term at which the convictions were had, the appeals are dismissed.

Reid v. State, 333 S.W.2d 142, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3079 (Tex. 1960).

Pincite

333 S.W.2d 142 (Reid v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

333 S.W.2d 140 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)