Reid v. State
This text of 512 So. 2d 1161 (Reid v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dwight REID, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Samek & Besser and Lawrence Besser, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Mulvey v. State, 41 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1949); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This case presents the same question certified in Bellinger v. State, 513 So.2d 732 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); and Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987):
IS USE OF THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE TO EXCEED THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR THE OFFENSE PRECLUDED WHERE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE SENTENCE?
Question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 So. 2d 1161, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.