Reid v. State
512 So. 2d 1161, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1987·No. 86-2176·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Dwight REID, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Samek & Besser and Lawrence Besser, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Mulvey v. State, 41 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1949); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This case presents the same question certified in Bellinger v. State, 513 So.2d 732 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); and Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987):
IS USE OF THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE TO EXCEED THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR THE OFFENSE PRECLUDED WHERE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE SENTENCE?
Question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reid v. State, 512 So. 2d 1161, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
512 So. 2d 1161 (Reid v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Inscho v. State
521 So. 2d 164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
McGriff v. State
517 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Johnson v. State
513 So. 2d 1388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)