Reid v. Sacks

Ohio Supreme Court

Reid v. Sacks

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 102

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 29, 1961·No. No. 36734·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no bill of exceptions and hence no evidence before this court from which to determine whether the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in any of its rulings which petitioner seeks to have this court review.

The law attaches to a judgment of a court of record, regular on its face, a presumption of validity, that the judgment was properly rendered and that the court had before it proper and sufficient evidence to support its judgment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is no bill of exceptions and hence no evidence before this court from which to determine whether the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in any of its rulings which petitioner seeks to have this court review.

The law attaches to a judgment of a court of record, regular on its face, a presumption of validity, that the judgment was properly rendered and that the court had before it proper and sufficient evidence to support its judgment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Reid v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 102 (Ohio 1961).

Pincite

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 102 (Reid v. Sacks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.