Reid v. Sacks

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 102
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 1961
DocketNo. 36734
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 102 (Reid v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 102 (Ohio 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no bill of exceptions and hence no evidence before this court from which to determine whether the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in any of its rulings which petitioner seeks to have this court review.

The law attaches to a judgment of a court of record, regular on its face, a presumption of validity, that the judgment was properly rendered and that the court had before it proper and sufficient evidence to support its judgment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-sacks-ohio-1961.