Reid v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reid v. Richards

89 A.D.2d 939, 454 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18153

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 3, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 89 A.D.2d 939 (Reid v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reid v. Richards, 89 A.D.2d 939, 454 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kirschenbaum, J.), dated September 1, 1982, reversed, on the law, and the motion to confirm the referee’s report to invalidate the designating petitions of the respondent Camacho granted, without costs. The respondent Camacho filed designating petitions as a Democratic Party candidate for Member of the New York City Council from the 13th Council District. He moved into the district after the date for the filing of designating petitions. Accordingly, he is not eligible. That the city council districts have been reapportioned this year provides no exemption from the residence requirement. (Matter of Ryan v Board of Elections of City of N. Y., 53 NY2d 515.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kirschenbaum, J.), dated September 1, 1982, reversed, on the law, and the motion to confirm the referee’s report to invalidate the designating petitions of the respondent Camacho granted, without costs. The respondent Camacho filed designating petitions as a Democratic Party candidate for Member of the New York City Council from the 13th Council District. He moved into the district after the date for the filing of designating petitions. Accordingly, he is not eligible. That the city council districts have been reapportioned this year provides no exemption from the residence requirement. (Matter of Ryan v Board of Elections of City of N. Y., 53 NY2d 515.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 939, 454 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-richards-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack