Reid v. Reid

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Reid v. Reid

225 S.E.2d 649, 29 N.C. App. 754, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2645

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJune 16, 1976

DocketNo. 7625DC148

StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.E.2d 649 (Reid v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reid v. Reid, 225 S.E.2d 649, 29 N.C. App. 754, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2645 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

The judgment and order from which defendant appeals adjudicate fewer than all the claims of the parties. Since they are interlocutory and the judge below failed to find there was “no just reason for delay” in appealing the judgment, they are not now subject to review. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b) ; Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp., 25 N.C. App. 18, 212 S.E. 2d 41 (1975), cert. denied 288 N.C. 241, 216 S.E. 2d 910 (1975).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEDRICK, Judge.

The judgment and order from which defendant appeals adjudicate fewer than all the claims of the parties. Since they are interlocutory and the judge below failed to find there was “no just reason for delay” in appealing the judgment, they are not now subject to review. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b) ; Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp., 25 N.C. App. 18, 212 S.E. 2d 41 (1975), cert. denied 288 N.C. 241, 216 S.E. 2d 910 (1975).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Arnold concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.E.2d 649, 29 N.C. App. 754, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-reid-ncctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack