Reid v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
This text of Reid v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC (Reid v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DWAYNE A. REID, JR., No. 1:24-CV-02101
Plaintiff,
v.
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
APRIL 8, 2025 Currently pending before the Court is Dwayne A. Reid, Jr.’s motion to amend his complaint.1 The original complaint relates to the assignment of debt and subsequent debt collection efforts against Reid.2 The proposed amended complaint alleges that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Honorable Julia K. Munley, the Honorable Phillip J. Caraballo, the Honorable William I. Arbuckle, Monia M. Littman, Esq., and Sonya M. Sovisto, Esq. conspired to violate Reid’s right by purportedly acting unfairly against him in the underlying case.3 This proposed amended complaint is wholly unconnected to the original complaint; Reid “allege[s] essentially a new action against new defendants with new claims arising out of a set of operative facts that are unrelated to the factual claims
1 Doc. 38. 2 Doc. 1. in the original” complaint, which is improper.4 Rather, these allegations should be brought, if at all, in a separate civil action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that Reid’s motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 38) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge
4 Nicholas v. Heffner, 228 F. App’x 139, 141 (3d Cir. 2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reid v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc-pamd-2025.