Reid v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
This text of 771 S.E.2d 726 (Reid v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case involves an attempt by Michael Reid to recover statutory penalties owed by his employer, the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (“MARTA”), as a result of MARTA’s failure to pay Reid his workers’ compensation benefits in a timely fashion. The trial court denied this request, finding that Reid was seeking to recover additional workers’ compensation benefits resulting from a change in condition, and that his claim was therefore barred by the two-year statute of limitation found in OCGA § 34-9-104 (b). In Reid v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 323 Ga. App. 523 (746 SE2d 779) (2013), this Court reversed the trial court’s ruling, finding that Reid’s claim did not result from a change in condition and that therefore the claim was not time-barred. The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed that decision in Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth. v. Reid, 295 Ga. 863 (763 SE2d 695) (2014).We therefore vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the Supreme Court’s opinion as our own, and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
771 S.E.2d 726, 331 Ga. App. 906, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-metropolitan-atlanta-rapid-transit-authority-gactapp-2015.