Reid v. Merrell
This text of 130 So. 713 (Reid v. Merrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Upon a mortgage foreclosure brought by appellee, the final decree awarded complainant $2,000.00 as principal, plus $682.57 as interest, plus taxes and costs. The decree also confirmed the report of the general master in chancery finding the sum of $500.00 as a reasonable attorney's fee. No predicate is laid in the bill of complaint, that complainant ever agreed or was obligated to pay his solicitors any amount to foreclose said mortgage, which is a *Page 1111
prerequisite to an awarding of such fees. Blount Bros. Realty Co. v. Eilenberger,
Each point raised by appellant has been duly considered and there being no error shown as to awarding the decree for principal, interest, taxes and costs, the final decree is affirmed as to those items. See Wayne Realty Inv. Co. v. Whitten,
The decree is reversed as to the awarding of $500.00 solicitor's fee, which is nearly 20% of the sum of the principal and interest due. It is not only excessive, but there is no allegation or proof that complainant ever agreed to pay any fee to his solicitors. Winchester v. Hak,
We do not overlook the fact that this case has heretofore been appealed to this Court from an order overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint, which demurrer was found to be without merit (Reid v. Merrill,
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 So. 713, 100 Fla. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-merrell-fla-1930.