Reid v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

295 A.D.2d 491, 744 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614

This text of 295 A.D.2d 491 (Reid v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 295 A.D.2d 491, 744 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, the New York City Transit Authority, and Melvin Stanford appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated April 6, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Deon Reid did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants failed to establish a prima facie case that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Deon Reid were not serious [492]*492within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756, 757). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flanagan v. Hoeg
212 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 A.D.2d 491, 744 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-nyappdiv-2002.