Reid v. Kessman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reid v. Kessman

56 A.D.2d 864, 392 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 864 (Reid v. Kessman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reid v. Kessman, 56 A.D.2d 864, 392 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to compel defendants to take certain action with respect to a refuse disposal area, in which action a judgment was entered, inter alia, directing defendants to compact and cover all refuse at the site, defendants Albert M. Kessman and Martin R. Kessman appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered September 30, 1976, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to adjudge them to be in contempt of court for having willfully violated the provisions of the said judgment, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, entered November 16, 1976, as, upon granting their motion for reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order entered September 30, 1976 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order entered November 16, 1976 affirmed insofar as appealed from, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Slifkin, dated September 10, 1976. Appellants’ time to pay the fine is extended until 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon and their time to compact and cover the refuse at the site is extended until 60 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to compel defendants to take certain action with respect to a refuse disposal area, in which action a judgment was entered, inter alia, directing defendants to compact and cover all refuse at the site, defendants Albert M. Kessman and Martin R. Kessman appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered September 30, 1976, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to adjudge them to be in contempt of court for having willfully violated the provisions of the said judgment, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, entered November 16, 1976, as, upon granting their motion for reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order entered September 30, 1976 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order entered November 16, 1976 affirmed insofar as appealed from, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Slifkin, dated September 10, 1976. Appellants’ time to pay the fine is extended until 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon and their time to compact and cover the refuse at the site is extended until 60 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 864, 392 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-kessman-nyappdiv-1977.