Reid v. Hospira, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Reid v. Hospira, Inc.

449 F. App'x 297

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 11, 2011·No. No. 11-1037·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Reid appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Reid’s claims of violations of The Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reid v. Hospira, Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00473-FL, 2010 WL 5173210 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Reid appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Reid’s claims of violations of The Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reid v. Hospira, Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00473-FL, 2010 WL 5173210 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reid v. Hospira, Inc., 449 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

449 F. App'x 297 (Reid v. Hospira, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related