Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reid v. Groom

Reid v. Groom

101 So. 2d 22, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1958
DocketNo. 57-102
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 2d 22 (Reid v. Groom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. Groom, 101 So. 2d 22, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the authority of Foster v. Thornton, 125 Fla. 699, 170 So. 459; Grubbs v. McShane, 144 Fla. 585, 198 So. 208; Hine v. Fox, Fla. 1956, 89 So.2d 13; and on the authority of City of Coral Gables v. Blount, 131 Fla. 36, 178 So. 554.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hine v. Fox
89 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Grubbs v. McShane
198 So. 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Foster v. Thornton
170 So. 459 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
City of Coral Gables v. Blount
178 So. 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 2d 22, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-groom-fladistctapp-1958.