Reid v. Groom

101 So. 2d 22, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1958·No. No. 57-102·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the authority of Foster v. Thornton, 125 Fla. 699, 170 So. 459; Grubbs v. McShane, 144 Fla. 585, 198 So. 208; Hine v. Fox, Fla. 1956, 89 So.2d 13; and on the authority of City of Coral Gables v. Blount, 131 Fla. 36, 178 So. 554.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reid v. Groom, 101 So. 2d 22, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

101 So. 2d 22 (Reid v. Groom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hine v. Fox
89 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Grubbs v. McShane
198 So. 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Foster v. Thornton
170 So. 459 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
City of Coral Gables v. Blount
178 So. 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)