Reid v. Gifford
6 Johns. Ch. 19, 1822 N.Y. LEXIS 136, 1822 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 35
Opinion
The Chancellor denied tfye motion, on the ground, that the tunnel had been made, Wnd the water diverted, upwards of three years ago, and the right ought first to be settled at law. The case of Weller v. Smeaton, (1 Cox’s Cases, 102.) he said, contained a rule applicable to the case.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reid v. Gifford, 6 Johns. Ch. 19, 1822 N.Y. LEXIS 136, 1822 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 35 (N.Y. 1822).
6 Johns. Ch. 19 (Reid v. Gifford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Madison v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co.
113 Tenn. 331 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1904)
Tuttle v. Church
53 F. 422 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1892)
Goodall v. Crofton
33 Ohio St. (N.S.) 271 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1877)
Burnham v. Kempton
44 N.H. 78 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Webber v. Gage
39 N.H. 182 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1859)
Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woolen Manuf'g Co.
18 F. Cas. 1181 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire, 1859)
Coe v. Winnepisiogee Lake Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co.
37 N.H. 254 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1858)
Burden v. Stein
27 Ala. 104 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1855)
Dana v. Valentine
46 Mass. 8 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1842)
Spooner v. McConnell
22 F. Cas. 939 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio, 1838)