Reid v. Ford
This text of Reid v. Ford (Reid v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6777
JONATHAN KEITH REID,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GLEN FORD, Officer; ALAN WALLER, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-02-244-1-WLO)
Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: March 9, 2006
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Keith Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Terry D. Horne, STILES, BYRUM & HORNE, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Keith Reid appeals the magistrate judge’s
denials of his motions for default judgment in this action under 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000); the district court subsequently granted
summary judgment to Defendants on the basis of qualified immunity,
though Reid does not challenge that ruling. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. See Reid v. Ford, No. CA-02-244-1-WLO (M.D.N.C. May 29,
2003; June 26, 2003; filed Aug. 7, entered Aug. 8, 2003; Dec. 4,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reid v. Ford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-ford-ca4-2006.