Reid v. Crawford's Administrators

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Reid v. Crawford's Administrators

3 N.J.L. 622

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1810·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— The fact was not put in issue; the plaintiff commenced the suit and filed his account as administrator. This was not objected to or denied. It is too late, after verdict and judgment, to take this objection.

It was then contended, that it was not set forth in the state of demand, that the plaintiff below was administrator.

By the Court.

— The copy of account filed, is headed by the name and title of the action, wherein the plaintiff is named administrator of the intestate.

Judgment Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

— The fact was not put in issue; the plaintiff commenced the suit and filed his account as administrator. This was not objected to or denied. It is too late, after verdict and judgment, to take this objection.

It was then contended, that it was not set forth in the state of demand, that the plaintiff below was administrator.

By the Court.

— The copy of account filed, is headed by the name and title of the action, wherein the plaintiff is named administrator of the intestate.

Judgment Affirmed.

Reid v. Crawford's Administrators, 3 N.J.L. 622 (N.J. 1810).

Pincite

3 N.J.L. 622 (Reid v. Crawford's Administrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.