Reid v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc.

191 S.E.2d 247, 16 N.C. App. 186, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1672
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided September 20, 1972·No. 7218SC579·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

The trial judge did not commit error, as plaintiff contends, In permitting the defendants to amend their answer to conform to the evidence after the evidence on both sides was in and after the parties had argued the case to the jury. Roberts v. Memorial Park, 281 N.C. 48, 187 S.E. 2d 721 (1972) ; G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15.

Plaintiff also contends that the trial judge committed error in the instructions given to the jury. After an examination of the charge as a whole, we are of the opinion that the trial judge did not commit prejudicial error therein.

In the trial we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Britt concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reid v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc., 191 S.E.2d 247, 16 N.C. App. 186, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1672 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

191 S.E.2d 247 (Reid v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Sapp
349 S.E.2d 304 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
Mobley v. Hill
341 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
Peed v. Peed
325 S.E.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Davis
245 S.E.2d 566 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)