Reid v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Reid v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc.

191 S.E.2d 247, 16 N.C. App. 186, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1672

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 20, 1972

Docket7218SC579

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 191 S.E.2d 247 (Reid v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reid v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc., 191 S.E.2d 247, 16 N.C. App. 186, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1672 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

The trial judge did not commit error, as plaintiff contends, In permitting the defendants to amend their answer to conform to the evidence after the evidence on both sides was in and after the parties had argued the case to the jury. Roberts v. Memorial Park, 281 N.C. 48, 187 S.E. 2d 721 (1972) ; G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15.

Plaintiff also contends that the trial judge committed error in the instructions given to the jury. After an examination of the charge as a whole, we are of the opinion that the trial judge did not commit prejudicial error therein.

In the trial we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Britt concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI