Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedMay 28, 2020
Docket2:19-cv-00747
StatusUnknown

This text of Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security (Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security, (M.D. Fla. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

SHARI LAVERN REID,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:19-cv-747-FtM-38NPM

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. / ORDER1 Before the Court is Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 20). The Commissioner believes that a remand is appropriate to allow the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to reassess Plaintiff Shari Reid’s claim, “including if warranted, what jobs Plaintiff can perform at step five of the sequential evaluation process.” (Doc. 20 at 1). Reid does not oppose the Motion. Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power to enter judgment, reversing and remanding a social security case for rehearing. See also Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-98 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 101-02 (1991). Given the parties’ representations and agreement on the matter, the Court grants the Motion and remands for further proceedings. See Morgan v. Astrue, No. 2:11-cv-615-FtM-29SPC, 2012 WL 695840, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2012). Accordingly, it is now

1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 20) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's decision denying benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all deadlines or pending motions, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 28th day of May, 2020.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-commissioner-of-social-security-flmd-2020.