Reid v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reid v. City of New York

249 A.D. 768, 292 N.Y.S. 1003, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 768 (Reid v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reid v. City of New York, 249 A.D. 768, 292 N.Y.S. 1003, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action brought to compel the determination of a claim to real property, pursuant to sections 500-512 of the Real Property Law, judgment modified by adding to each of the first three decretal paragraphs thereof, after the words “ number 335,” “ without right ” and “ without right ” respectively, the following statement: “ except those portions of Allotment No. 8 embraced within the two separate condemnation proceedings mentioned in defendant’s proposed Finding No. 20.” As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to respondent. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. No opinion. Young, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to establish ownership in the land under water beyond the fill. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action brought to compel the determination of a claim to real property, pursuant to sections 500-512 of the Real Property Law, judgment modified by adding to each of the first three decretal paragraphs thereof, after the words “ number 335,” “ without right ” and “ without right ” respectively, the following statement: “ except those portions of Allotment No. 8 embraced within the two separate condemnation proceedings mentioned in defendant’s proposed Finding No. 20.” As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to respondent. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. No opinion. Young, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to establish ownership in the land under water beyond the fill. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 768, 292 N.Y.S. 1003, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1936.